Skip to content

TypeObjectRegistry refactor [21134] - #132

Merged
EduPonz merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
feature/type-registry-refactor
Jun 14, 2024
Merged

TypeObjectRegistry refactor [21134]#132
EduPonz merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
feature/type-registry-refactor

Conversation

@richiware

@richiware richiware commented Jun 3, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

This PR only regenerate the IDL files.

Related implementation PR:

Contributor Checklist

  • Commit messages follow the project guidelines.
  • N/A Tests that thoroughly check the new feature have been added/Regression tests checking the bug and its fix have been added; the added tests pass locally
  • N/A Changes are API compatible.
  • N/A Applicable backports have been included in the description.

Reviewer Checklist

  • The PR has a milestone assigned.
  • The title and description correctly express the PR's purpose.
  • Check contributor checklist is correct.
  • Check CI results: changes do not issue any warning.
  • Check CI results: failing tests are unrelated with the changes.

@richiware richiware changed the title TypeObjectRegistry refactor TypeObjectRegistry refactor [21134] Jun 3, 2024
@richiware
richiware force-pushed the feature/type-registry-refactor branch from 0af74f9 to 5a8a7ec Compare June 11, 2024 08:27
@richiware

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

[Manual CI] passed ✅

Signed-off-by: Ricardo González Moreno <ricardo@richiware.dev>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo González Moreno <ricardo@richiware.dev>
@richiware
richiware force-pushed the feature/type-registry-refactor branch from 5a8a7ec to c74610e Compare June 13, 2024 08:13
@richiware

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Manual CI passed ✅

@EduPonz EduPonz added this to the v2.0.0 milestone Jun 14, 2024
@EduPonz
EduPonz merged commit e42e26d into main Jun 14, 2024
@EduPonz
EduPonz deleted the feature/type-registry-refactor branch June 14, 2024 05:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants